New Polls Show Americans Oppose immigration

Lemmings and Miracles


Posted on February 8, 2011 by Hunter Wallace



Miracles are not solutions

White America



Rasmussen has a new poll out that sheds considerable light on the subject of how White Nationalists should engage White America. There are two competing points of view on this subject.



“Mainstreamers” believe the White majority is sympathetic to our beliefs and that we should work through the system to connect with a mass audience and confront our enemies in a lawful manner.



“Vanguardists” believe that the White majority are “lemmings” who dance to whatever tune is played by an elite cabal of string pullers in the mass media. They believe in rejecting the system and forming a “hardcore nucleus” of true believers who will rise to power in the aftermath of the collapse.



State of America



Here are the latest poll numbers:



- 57 percent of likely U.S. voters believe the policies and practices of the federal government encourage illegal immigration.



- 21 percent of likely U.S. voters believe the federal government does not encourage illegal immigration.



- 47 percent of voters say that relying on the federal government to enforce federal immigration law is a better approach than relying on individual states to enforce immigration law.



- 44 percent of voters would rather rely on the individual states to enforce federal immigration law.



- 68 percent of voters say that securing the border is more important than legalizing illegal aliens.



- 25 percent of voters say that legalizing illegal aliens is more important.



- 64 percent of voters say the U.S. military should be used to secure the border.



- 60 percent of Republicans favor the states acting on their own to enforce federal immigration laws.



- 59 percent of Democrats think it is better to rely on the federal government to enforce federal immigration laws.



- 78 percent of mainstream voters say that border security is more important than legalizing illegal aliens.



- 50 percent of the political class thinks border security is more important than amnesty.



- 70 percent of mainstream voters believe the federal government encourages illegal immigration.



- 54 percent of the political class believes the federal government does not encourage illegal immigration.



- 65 percent of the political class would rather rely upon the federal government to enforce immigration laws.



- 55 percent of mainstream voters would rather rely upon the states to enforce immigration laws.



- 58 percent of Americans oppose granting birthright citizenship to the children of illegal aliens.





Observations



Nothing here should come as a surprise.



The numbers above are racially inclusive. Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and Jews were included in the poll. This skews the results considerably to the Left.



White voters are far more supportive of restrictionist immigration laws than the Rasmussen numbers indicate.



We have public opinion on our side. The mainstream media is unable to dictate the course of the immigration debate. White America flatly does not trust either the mainstream media or the political class to handle immigration anymore.



If you do a Google News search for “immigration,” as I do every morning, you will be hard pressed to find a single article in the mainstream media that is supportive of restrictionist immigration laws. Journalists are almost unanimously supportive of amnesty for illegal aliens.



We need to stop lying to ourselves about several important subjects:



- White people are able to see through the media bias on immigration.



- There are real and significant differences between “progressives” and “conservatives” on immigration. This is also true of “Democrats” and “Republicans.”



- The constituency for new restrictionist immigration laws are populist conservatives who are concentrated in the Republican Party.



- Given the state of public opinion, we have a serious problem on the organizational and message fronts.



Miracles



In related news, Jared Taylor weighed in on this subject at the 2011 Amren conference. He “characterized the present age” as one of “belief in miracles.”



After discussing the wishful thinking that is so prevalent in the mainstream, Taylor addressed the most powerful myth that prevails in our own circles:



“Mr. Taylor chided some race realists for believing in their own miracle: that the economic and social systems will soon collapse, and that a strong white racial consciousness will emerge from the rubble. Instead, he urged whites to take advantage of the rising anger against the direction in which the country is moving and to undertake the hard, painstaking work of politics. Even just a few race realists on school boards or city councils would have a huge psychological and propaganda effect, and would begin to channel current frustrations in promising directions.”



The polls have shown for years that White America is ripe to be organized against the mainstream media and political class on immigration. Immigration is by far the most important public policy issue to White Nationalists.



The polls also show that White America is similarly fed up with racial double standards, media bias, multiculturalism, free trade, foreign aid, foreign wars, and especially the skyrocketing national debt and government spending on privileged minorities. These are all perceived as legitimate grievances.



If you take the White Nationalist political platform and poll each separate plank of our agenda, you will find that most of our views are not only mainstream, but actually quite centrist in their level of public support.



There is something wrong with our approach.



Final Thoughts



I think the major problem we have is that we are getting too far ahead of our audience.



White Nationalists tend to be “truth tellers.” They are disproportionately bright people who have personalities that incline them toward questioning authority.



This is a good thing in the sense that it allows White Nationalists to see through the prevailing taboos against White racial consciousness. It also comes at the expense of coming across as tone deaf before most audiences.



The hare has to travel at the same speed of the tortoise to lead the turtles in the right direction. This goes against the grain of our personalities.



Most White Nationalists don’t have the patience to lead or interact with ordinary White people. They end up traveling far ahead of the curve, isolating themselves in the process, and hurling insults at their audience from the fringes of society.



Sometimes you have to go backward to go forward.



In our case, we have to back to where White people are today, organize them around popular issues like illegal immigration and racial double standards, establish ourselves as legitimate authority figures, and then lead ordinary people at their own slow plodding pace to a mass racial awakening.



It is not going to be easy.



In my humble opinion, that is the only way we are ever going to get White America and White Nationalists moving along on the right track.



http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2011/02/08/lemmings-and-miracles/

House Republicans May Cut UN Funding

I have been complaining about the UN for a while now. It is a vicious anti-White organization that will destroy Austria and the West with mass immigration. People like Fekter and Spindelegger love the UN. No american Tax dollars for the UN !!!!!!!! NO MASS IMMIGRATION CARD !!!!!!!!



http://thehill.com/news-by-subject/foreign-policy/139563-the-world-from-the-hill-un-funding-an-early-target-for-house-republicans

By Bridget Johnson - 01/23/11 05:22 PM ET




A key House Republican is quickly pressing forward with her goals to scale back U.S. funding for the United Nations.



Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, told The Hill that oversight would be a key function of the panel, particularly funding to the U.N. Human Rights Council (HRC) that is "a waste of taxpayer dollars."



"I'd like to make sure that we once and for all kill all U.S. funding for that beast," she said last month. "Because I don't think that it advances U.S. interests, I don't think that that's a pro-democracy group, it's a rogue's gallery, pariah states, they belong there because they don't want to be sanctioned."...



Here he is !

Advice for Maria Fekter from Presidential Candidate Pat Buchannan and Fox News

Spindelegger und Fekter mit Hillary Clinton gegen Osterreich und Arizona ?

Spindelegger With Hillary Clinton 

California Woman files Genocide Complaint At UN because government Destroys White Christians

“In the face of Hillary Clinton’s filing a UN Complaint seeking the UN High
Commissioner for Human Rights to rule that AZ’s new immigration law violates
“human rights”, I have filed a complaint (registered mail 9/3/10) with that
same High Commissioner charging the US Federal Government with GENOCIDE of
European-American Christians.  I ask you to publicize this in any ways that
you can.  It truly is a powerful response that can be used to bring Clinton,
Obama et al. into at least an interesting dilemma.


The act of GENOCIDE trumps all international and human rights laws (and US
Public Law and the US Constitution (see attached filing), and if the UN
Commissioner Pillay dares to rule favorably on Hillary’s complaint, she must
*MUST* rule that the intentional destruction of Euro-American Christians
preempts and nullifies Clinton’s lesser complaint, and all efforts that
coddle Third World immigration, legal and illegal.  Such a UN ruling also
would stop all challenges to AZ law, and force the Feds to immediately halt
all efforts to maintain open borders, and begin legal reparations to restore
the majority Euro-Am Christian population.  If UN Commissioner Pillay
upholds Clinton’s complaint, but refuses to act on this GENOCIDE complaint,
she is ruling that human rights and international laws, including the 1948
UN Convention on Genocide are no longer binding on the U.S. government or
that European-American Christians, alone, are not protected by those laws.
That said, I ask all of you to publicize this complaint, and ask others to
use it to file their own complaints.  I believe that actions of Clinton, AG
Holder’s DOJ, Congress, the Supreme Court and the entire Obama
Administration — having taken steps to subvert our Constitution and laws,
both of which in fact SUPPORT the UN Convention on Genocide — must be met
with a superseding complaint in the UN.


A California woman has filed a formal complaint with the UN High
Commissioner for Human Rights charging the US federal government with
genocide of European-American Christians through its immigration policies.
Terry Graham sent the eight-page complaint to UN High Commissioner
Navanethem Pillay on Sept. 3, after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s
filed a report with Pillay’s office claiming that the federal government’s
legal challenge to Arizona’s new immigration law will protect “human
rights”.


In July, the US Dept. of Justice filed a lawsuit in federal district court
seeking to nullify and prevent enforcement of Arizona’s immigration law,
asserting the federal government alone has authority over immigration.
Earlier, President Obama attacked Arizona’s law, saying it was “unfair” and
potentially violated the civil rights of Hispanic citizens.


“The US Constitution, and US federal and international laws against genocide
preempt and nullify all laws, policies and procedures – including those
advanced illegally last month by the Executive, Legislative and Judicial
branches of our federal government that result in the destruction of
European-Americans,” says Graham.


Graham’s complaint cites the UN Genocide Convention of 1948, international
and human rights laws, US Public Law 95-435 and the US Constitution, Article
I, Section 8, which gives the US Congress the power to “define and punish…
offences against the Law of Nations.”


The UN Genocide Convention defines genocide” as “deliberately inflicting
upon [a group] conditions of life calculated to bring about the physical
destruction in whole or in part.” Article II further defines genocide as
“causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group” and
“imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group”, which can
include job losses and taxation policies that cause stress and lower
birthrates.  Under the Convention, which Congress adopted under US Public
Law 95-435, “group” is defined by nation, race, ethnicity, or religion.
Graham noted that in 1960, Euro-American Christians comprised 89% percent of
the nation’s population, but now are minorities in many parts of the United
States solely due to federal actions that promote massive Third world
immigration.


In 1998, Hillary Clinton’s husband, Pres. Bill Clinton, publicly
acknowledged that the destruction of White Christian Americans was
intentional when he said, “In a little more than 50 years, there will be no
majority race in the United States.”


In her complaint, Graham asks the UN Human Rights Commissioner to promptly
investigate her charges and “make an immediate, formal request of the US
federal government to place a judicial stay on all US laws, policies,
procedures, lawsuits and legal actions that advance this genocide.”  She is
also seeking reparations as defined by the UN Genocide Convention that “must
wipe out all the consequences of the illegal act and to re-establish the
situation which would, in all probability, have existed if that act had not
been committed.”


Graham is urging others to file their own complaints with the UN High
Commissioner for Human Rights via mail or email as soon as possible.  She
also asks that lawsuits be filed charging the US federal government with
genocide of European-American Christians in US and courts in nations who are
signatories to the UN Convention on Genocide.


“If the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights refuses or fails to
investigate and rule on my complaint that the U.S. federal government’s
laws, policies, procedures and other actions are an act of genocide against
U.S. European-American Christians, we must conclude that ”human rights and
international law are no longer binding on the U.S. government or that
European-American Christians, alone, are not protected by those laws, Graham
said.”

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Was kann Spindelegger nach USA 2010 Wahl sagen  ? Hillary wird kein Arbeit haben. LOL

 

Spindelegger Tries to Escape Reality in Canada

Idiot Spindelegger Shakes hands with a White Canadian immigrant as example of success to start 3rd world immigration into Austria

http://kurier.at/nachrichten/2047447.php

Quebec

After the war, the French separatist issue once again came to the fore, with a number of compromises being put forward: all of which, essentially, entailed the province of Quebec staying in the union but acquiring special status. By 1970, the main Quebec separatist party, the Party Quebecois (PQ), had won nearly a quarter of the votes in its' home province.

Above: A pro Quebec separatist vote bus during the 1969 election in that province. Despite gaining much popular support, the Quebec separatists never quite achieved a majority support base in Canada. The influx of non-Whites into Quebec in the last  part of the 20th Century will have now made a Quebec separatist victory even more unlikely, as the non-Whites perceive the Quebec separatists to be racially based. This in turn has led to the non-Whites voting overwhelmingly against the Quebec separatists in the 1995 referendum on the issue.

In 1976, the PQ was elected as the provincial government of Quebec and after introducing some pro-French language measures, called a referendum on whether to proceed with further separatist actions. The vote was 60 percent against and the PQ was forced to place its separatist agenda on the back burner.

In 1995, the PQ managed to hold a second referendum on the separatist issue: this time it was defeated by less than one percent of the vote (no votes : 50.4 percent; yes votes : 49.6 percent) indicating that ethnic divisions within Canada between White French and White English speakers were far from over.

The French Canadian separatists were accused of racism when one of their leaders made public note that the non-White minorities in Quebec were, virtually to the last voter, opposed to French Canadian separatism.

Black Immigration

The first Blacks to enter Canada did so as slaves: the importation of Black slaves into French Canada from the West Indies was authorized by the French government in 1689. Slavery was abolished about one hundred years later, with Nova Scotia being the first colony to abolish the practice in 1787, followed by Ontario six years later.

When British troops burned Washington, the U.S. capital, in the War of 1812 (1812-1815), they brought back to Halifax many slaves who had sought refuge with them. Escape to Canada meant freedom, and thus it was a major destination of the so-called Underground Railroad, a network of secret routes by which U.S. abolitionists spirited slaves out of the American South.

Despite the apparent freedom offered to Blacks in British Canada, Nova Scotia and Ontario had legally-, racially-segregated public-schools until the 1960s. In that decade, Canada opened immigration to new areas, and significant numbers of Blacks (mainly from the Caribbean) and Asians started entering the country.

In 1971 the government started funding non-White ethnic organizations, festivals and second language instruction in schools within Canada itself.

The rise in Black immigration during the last twenty years of the 20th century from the Caribbean and Africa was not accompanied by any great rise in social status: Blacks remain the poorest and worst educated Canadians, being far outstripped by the much more recent Asian immigrants on all fields. 

Roots of conflict date to French and Indian war 

Amerind Territorial claims

Amerind territorial claims also resurfaced in the 1960's, spurred on by the climate created by the broader civil rights movements. In the 1960s, the city of Ottawa introduced a policy to end the special rights and status of Amerinds - but this policy was never implemented, being sabotaged by a Supreme Court decision following a case brought by an Amerind tribe, the Nisga'a of British Columbia.

This court decision held that Amerind rights to the land had been in place at the time of colonization, but the court was divided on whether those rights had been ended by White settlement.

Several treaties were subsequently concluded with Amerind tribes: in terms of one in 1984, the Inuit of the Mackenzie Delta, settled their title to 242,000 square kilometers; and another in 1992, settled the right of the Inuit of the eastern Arctic to 350,000 square kilometers of land and 36,000 square kilometers of subsurface mineral rights.

Further negotiations have sought separate agreements for virtually all the other major Amerind tribes, all of which confirmed their rights to large areas of land. However, not all disputes have been settled peacefully: in more than one case armed standoffs have ensued, with one of the most famous being the Mohawk blockade of Oka in Quebec in 1990. 

I don't know what he is preaching now, but priminister Harper (atleast in 1988) would not get along with Spindelegger.

Racial Consequences of the Settlement of Canada

The racial clashes which accompanied the settlement of Canada were not nearly as marked as those which accompanied the birth of the United States of America. This was because the numbers of Whites settling the area increased at a slower pace than in America, and the change in the demographic makeup was not as quick as it was to the south.

From this a valuable lesson can be learned: the history of Canada proves that armed conflict and violent dispossession is not always needed to engender the change in a territory's demographic makeup: it is possible also to achieve the same end by means of relatively peaceful immigration.

The last quarter of the 20th century has seen Canada become the focus for a large wave of Third World immigration: the extent and consequences of this are discussed in the last two chapters of this book.

http://www.white-history.com/hwr55.htm

More facts about Canada for nut case Spindelegger:

~ like 80 Austrias can fit into canada so there is room for the different groups to live separate from eachother and they generally do.

~More Canadians are against mass immigration of third nations that for at present according to polls. And the majority of White Canadians are against it. I just had a long conversation with my canadian friend about this recently.

~The Asian immigrants tend to congregate in cities

~Majority of ethnic French Quebecois want independence.

~multi kult was enshrined into canadian constitution partially to appease Quebec

~the canadian government used tricks and distortions to start mass immigration just like the 1965 immigration act supporters and  you yourself now

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do you push relentlessy for mass immigration despite the evidence against it ?

How will Austria be an immigration nation when you have a right wing party like the FPO already ready to legislate against them and resist you ? And people who will never accept them ? And the most recent Vienna election results ?

Why do you ignore the evidence against you and your devious plans ?


Mass Immigration Opposed in Canada:
1
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2010/09/reform_group_ar.php

 2

http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2010/09/canadian_view_o.php

Largest Republican Victory in History: Marxists Driven Out of Washington !

Election 2010—A Grinding Trench Warfare Advance For Immigration Patriots

[Peter Brimelow] @ 3:00 am

Election 2010 turns out to be a grinding trench warfare advance for the cause of patriotic immigration reform, but it was an absolute triumph for Roy Beck at NumbersUSA who has been talking ebulliently for nearly ten hours straight on his organization’s webcast as I write. (Who needs the networks?) Roy argues in detail that the balance of power in both the House and the Senate has shifted significantly in the direction of patriotic immigration reform and it’s well worth looking at his pie charts.
Among key immigration patriots, there are losers (Tancredo, alas; Angle) and winners (Barletta, Brewer, Deal). We know from experience that nothing short of victory will get the political Establishment’s attention—but it’s important to note that we also know even victory (Proposition 187, Proposition 200) would simply be flushed straight down the memory hole.
It’s a new Congress. And new immigration patriot leaders will emerge. The long war goes on

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2010/11/03/election-2010-a-grinding-trench-warfare-advance-for-immigration-patriots/

Amongst the other good news and highlights of the mid term race in my opinion:

~ Arizona bans"Affirmative Action" and quotas with Proposition 107

~ White Nationalist Jim Russell gets  40% or almost 55,000 votes (this guy is farther right than Strache supposedly) and the FPO only gets afew hundred thousand votes in Austria LOL (Jim actually knew Jared Taylor rumor has it)

~Rick Scott wins Florida Governorship and wants to bring tough "Arizona Style" laws to Florida as well as almost 25 new anti-immigration governors in states Throughout the country. 

~ Right-winger Michele Bachmann (ALIPAC endorsed)  who called for McCarthy like investigations of other politicians for communist ties wins comfortably and her state MN flips from Dem to GOP for the most part.Which is good because illegal immigration is making the predominantly Northern European descended people of MN a minority.

~Son of Cuban Exile GOP  candidate warns of the danger from marxism in victory speech.

~ Rand Paul, Son of non interventionist foreign policy advocate and lightning rod Ron Paul wins comfortably in Kentucky.(he opposed Iraq war and made controversial statements about forced racial integration of the 1960's)

~many candidates with strong NUMBERSUSA and ALIPAC ratings were elected

There are many more important victories to discuss but this may suffice for now.


Inspiration Speech from Lou Barletta: "You have put your children and grandchildren First".. "Thank you all"


And here is an election analysis of some key races from a more demographic perspective and bad or mixed news:

California: GOP meg Whitman loses to old man Jerry Brown despite spending 150 million or so dollars and pandering spanish TV ads. The reason for this may be the fact that Latinos and 3rd country immigrants (mexicans) generally are highly dependent on social services and have their own unique interests which differ from the general majority amongst other things. In an ironic and symbolic twist of fate as Austria is about to go under with immigration, an Austrian descended person may be the last GOP governor of a now minority majority state which was once the Reagan Dream in better times but is now the quintessence of the negative impact of changing demographics caused by mass immigration from 3rd countries.

Nevada: Sharon angle loses to Harry Reid by a small margin. Angle carried all of Nevada except the two big liberal cities of Reno and Las Vegas. She was projected to win in all of the polls. Contrary to popular belief the ads she made did not decrease her support but increased it as her poll numbers increased after the controversial ads. I suspect voter fraud and may she yet run again.

Harry Reid and Fraud:
http://www.aolnews.com/surge-desk-elections/article/claims-that-harry-reid-stole-nevada-senate-election-resurface/19701816
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/01/sarah-palin-endorses-tom-_1_n_777364.html
Colorado: Anti-immigration enthusiast and Tea Party favorite Tom Tancredo comes on strong and would have carried the day if it was not for Dan Maes refusing to drop out. Dan Maes divided the GOP and may have even dragged down the entire party by refusing to withdraw from the race. Once again all of Colorado except soon to be minority majority Denver supported Tancredo and Buck en masse.I am also quite certain of leftist voter fraud.Recounts are underway all over the state.

Palin Endorses Tancredo
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/01/sarah-palin-endorses-tom-_1_n_777364.html
There are similar trends in comparison to these two states across the nation.A a general rule the GOP also did better in the House elections than the senate, because the house districts are rural and local elections where most Whites live. In contrast the senate is state wide and includes big cities which are very leftists and predominantly minority.Obama alienated Whites with mass immigration support, and affirmative action and drove them away to the GOP. In contrast the Dems have almost 91% of Blacks and 70% of Mexicans backing them. The election results are obviously good for right-wingers, but at the same time they reveal a stratified society and torn country in the shadow of what was once a greater nation before massive third world immigration. It is certainly possible atleast for some states that Whites have become dispossessed in their own nation.

Furthermore, although the races in usa are generally divided along political lines in the usa, the GOP is not a WN movement and there are some minority Republicans just like there are zealous Marxist White democrats. And racism  does not divide the races politically, but competing innate community interests do. But in this case the objectives are important.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here is a good article from RealClearPolitics which confirms my previous statements and observations by Paul Kuhn (Cohen ?)

Exit Polls: Unprecedented White Flight from Democrats

By David Paul Kuhn
Democrats performed worse with whites on Tuesday than in any other congressional election since the Second World War.

Democratic problems with whites stretch back nearly a half-century. Political white flight changed course with the implosion of George W. Bush's presidency, the Republican Party and the economy in September 2008.

It's now as if the chasm between whites and Democrats never narrowed. Democrats' bad old days are back.

Republicans won whites in Tuesday's national House vote by a 22-percentage point margin (60 to 38 percent) according to exit polls. In 2006, Republicans won whites by a mere 4 points. Whites shifted at three-fold the rate of Hispanics between the two midterms, while the black vote remained steady. Democrats faired even worse than in 1994, when Republicans won whites by 16 points (58 to 42 percent) and with them, a landslide.
Lyndon Johnson's domestic programs lost the majority by 1966, because he lost whites. Obama has done the same in much the same way. Only about a third of white men and white women approved of Obama's signature domestic legislation, healthcare, at the time of its passage. Whites similarly opposed the stimulus. It's no accident that over the summer of 2009, when healthcare dominated the debate, Obama first lost the majority of whites and independents.

In other words we never had a real choice with the 1965 non western immigration act and most people were and are against it, along with "great society" and the entire LBJ legacy. But at the same time Fekter pushes the "Rot weiss rot card" as if it were something to emulate and the elections today generally affirm my previous observations and statements.


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/11/03/exit_polls_unprecedented_white_flight_from_democrats__107824.html


Why has the OVP-SPO been strangely silent about what happened today ? Will they continue to push immigration, globalism and anti-family based on failed dreams and ideas ? Or will reality hit them on the Head ? This election seems to be a rejection of mass immigration, Hillary Clinton, cultural marxism and Obama etc..

Thank You for the Help in USA elections FPO !

Neubauer as an OSCE observer in Midterm Elections

"Als OSZE-Wahlbeobachter nimmt FPÖ-NAbg. As an OSCE election observer takes FPÖ NAbg. Werner Neubauer derzeit an den Kongress- und Gouverneurswahlen in den USA teil. Werner Neubauer present to Congress and gubernatorial elections in the U.S. part. Bisher liege die Wahlbeteiligung bei rund 15 Prozent und es seien keinerlei Vorfälle beziehungsweise Unregelmäßigkeiten zu erwähnen, gab Neubauer bekannt. So far the turnout be around 15 percent, and there were no incidents or irregularities to mention, announced Neubauer.
Nach einer kurzen Einführung in das US-amerikanische Wahlsystem konnte sich Neubauer direkt in den Wahllokalen von der Funktionstüchtigkeit der neuen Touch-Screen Wahlmaschinen samt Scanner überzeugen. After a brief introduction to the American electoral system was able to convince Neubauer directly at the polling stations of the functionality of the new touch-screen voting machines, including scanners. "Das System der elektronischen Wahlen wird auch in Österreich nicht aufzuhalten sein", so Neubauer. "Be the system of electronic voting will not reside in Austria," said Neubauer.
Derzeit befindet sich der österreichische OSZE-Vertreter Neubauer in Washington DC und wird sich noch heute nach Virginia begeben. Currently, there is the Austrian OSCE representatives Neubauer in Washington DC and will go today to Virginia."

http://www.fpoe.at/news/detail/news/neubauer-als-osze-beobachter-b/?cHash=d7306c46310166e2b8a18796e312752f

I understand you have acted as an observer in the American elections. This is good because  here in the USA the New Black Panther party intimidates voters like in the last election. Furthermore there is a large risk of voter fraud mainly from the left. Many people needed increased numbers of observers and more hands helps.

NBP does it again and blocks White voters:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/02/new-black-panther-spotted-philadelphia-polling-place/

Democrats hate election observers:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/dem-congressman-objects-to-voter-fraud-crackdown/

The trip itself is telling. First of all you have gone to Washington DC. If you travel to the wrong area of Washington DC you are likely to get hurt as it is a "murder capital". Many naive European tourists don't know this and get hurt unfortunately . Secondly, the fact that in today's age there must be election observers in the USA is disturbing and shows the negative impact of mass immigration and multi-culti. All the more reason to stop immigration in your own country before it is too late. If Fekter & Co can't take a hint from this, then I don't know what will stop the insanity.

 The possibilities electorally look good LOL Maybe Hillary Clinton could lose her job LOL

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/generic_congressional_ballot

Even if the right-wing here wins. I will still be sad because I worry that Austria would be destroyed and I don't think there is anything I could do to help other than write essays on here, try and "wake people up" and  show that Americans are tired of the left wing crap and set an example for the OVP-SPO harbingers of Austria's doom with their crazy ideas of immigration and anti-family :-(